Legal Opinion

Grady v. Corbin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1990No. 89-474PublishedCited by 1,496 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

We have long held, see Blockburger v. United States, 284 U. S. 299, 304 (1932), that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment1 prohibits successive prosecutions for the same criminal act or transaction under two criminal statutes whenever each statute does not “requir[e] proof of a fact which the other does not.” In Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U. S. 410 (1980), we suggested that even if two successive prosecutions were not barred by the Blockburger test, the second prosecution would be barred if the prosecution sought to establish an essential element of the second crime by proving the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,496 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

1,491 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API