Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Caufman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1992No. 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s pretrial motion requesting that her case be dismissed on the grounds that the present prosecution violates the Double Jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution. The sole issue raised on review is whether appellant’s prosecution for homicide by vehicle is barred by double jeopardy due to her previous plea of guilty to a summary traffic citation.

The relevant facts in this controversy are succinctly stated by the trial court and are as follows:

On October 26, 1990, Mary Caufmann [sic] was operating a motor vehicle on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. CaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. CaufmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. CaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. Exley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API