Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Charles Conway

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1915No. 12334PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Benton county, Holcomb, J., entered April 1, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action on promissory notes.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant, the First National Bank of Kennewick, brought this action against the respondents Conway, seeking to recover upon two promissory notes, the one for $1,500 and the other for $1,000, and an overdraft of $302.98 which the respondents had incurred in their account with the bank. The respondents answered, making certain denials and setting up a counterclaim. The counterclaim arose out of a contract for the sale of real property. It was alleged that the bank entered into a contract with the respondents for the purchase of certain described real property, agreeing to pay therefor a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nash v. TowneSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Briggs v. . PartridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Byington v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Sanger v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Barbre v. GoodaleOregon Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Brown Bros. v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Paterson & Edey Lumber Co. v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Signal Drilling Co. v. Liberty Petroleum Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API