Robertson v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
— That the claimant suffered an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment is not disputed. The only controversy is as to whether the pneumonia which followed was the result of the injury.
If the record discloses evidence fairly tending to show that the penumonia resulted from the accidental personal injury received by claimant in the course of his employment by Stockton Brothers, the judgment of the Circuit Court must be affirmed. It is a declaration of our fundamental law that—
“No fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Von Ette's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McLaren v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Ingalls v. IsenseeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Baker v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Kinney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.