Legal Opinion
Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1922PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, O. J.
On December 21, 1920, the plaintiff filed with the Industrial Accident Commis-. sion a workman’s claim for compensation by which it appears that he was in the employ of the Pacific Car & Foundry Company, engaged in building cars, and that he was occupied in upholstering for seven weeks. He states that the accident happened while he was working in the erecting shop; that he put nails in his mouth; and that on account thereof a severe case of lead poisoning ensued, resulting in *652obstruction of the bowels. The commission at first disallowed his claim entirely, but afterwards…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Lovelace v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Zagar v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Lough v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Dondeneau v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- United States Gypsum Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.