Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1929No. 4856PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.
This is a review of an award of compensation in favor of Corwin R. Graves, a taxicab driver in the employ of the Yellow Cab Company. The facts are fairly stated in the findings of the Industrial Commission as follows:
“That on the ISth day of May, 1928, the applicant, Corwin R. Graves, pursued his duties as a taxi-cab driver for the said Yellow Cab Company and called at Rowland Hall early in the morning to pick up two passengers and haul them to the depot; upon his arrival at Rowland Hall he called for his passengers and carried two suit cases to the taxicab for his passengers, and while…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Head Drilling Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Bingham Mines Co. v. AllsopUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Cook v. Charles Hoertz & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Gunnison Sugar Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Reiss v. Northway Motor & Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- J. v. Vozzolo, Inc., Successor to James Vincent Vozzolo v. Theodore Britton, Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of Employees' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Whitfield v. Daniel Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Carabetta v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Salt Lake County v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Royal Canning Corporation v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.