Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1929No. 4856PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This is a review of an award of compensation in favor of Corwin R. Graves, a taxicab driver in the employ of the Yellow Cab Company. The facts are fairly stated in the findings of the Industrial Commission as follows:

“That on the ISth day of May, 1928, the applicant, Corwin R. Graves, pursued his duties as a taxi-cab driver for the said Yellow Cab Company and called at Rowland Hall early in the morning to pick up two passengers and haul them to the depot; upon his arrival at Rowland Hall he called for his passengers and carried two suit cases to the taxicab for his passengers, and while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Head Drilling Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bingham Mines Co. v. AllsopUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Cook v. Charles Hoertz & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Gunnison Sugar Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Reiss v. Northway Motor & Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. J. v. Vozzolo, Inc., Successor to James Vincent Vozzolo v. Theodore Britton, Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of Employees' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Whitfield v. Daniel Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. Carabetta v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Salt Lake County v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Royal Canning Corporation v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API