Legal Opinion

Baker v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] AFFIRMED. The defendant, State Industrial Commission appealed from a judgment, based upon the verdict of a jury, in favor of Mary M. Baker, claimant and widow of Frank O. Baker, who died July 16, 1926.

It is conceded in this case that on April 17, 1926, Baker, and his employer, the Coates Driving and Boom Company, a corporation, were under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The company was engaged in logging and lumbering operations in Tillamook County. On that date…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Jones v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Brown v. O.-W. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Miami Quarry Co. v. Seaborg Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rix v. Town of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Keefer v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Kinney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Heuchert v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Armstrong v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API