Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Dunning

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1916No. 4852PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. R.'Taylor, Judge. Action by J. J. Dunning against C. C. Ingram and another. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error to recover the sum of $25,000, with interest thereon at 8 per cent, per annum, for the breach of a contract to manufacture and market a remedy for tuberculosis, and for the wrongful .appropriation of the formula for compounding said remedy. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they were in the trial court. •

The petition, in substance, alleges as follows: That defendants induced this plaintiff to enter into a written contract with said defendants on said 1st day of February, 1908,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. HolidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Mayor, Aldermen, and Commonalty, of City of New York v. RansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Terry v. CreedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Hassell v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. ReinhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Hepner v. Quapaw Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Riddle v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API