Legal Opinion

Puls v. Casey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1907PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County, before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

This was an action to recover damages for breach of contract. The plaintiff in error was the owner of a saloon, consisting of a stock of liquors and saloon fixtures at Dover, in Kingfisher county. The following written agreement was entered into by the parties to the action:

“Dover, Okla., 4-25-1903.
“It is agreed between L. Puls and Bobert Casey that L. Puls sells to said Casey his saloon fixtures and stock for the sum of $337.50 and invoice; said Casey pays to said Puls the said $337.50 cash to bind bargain, and L. Puls agrees to assist in every way…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meierholtz v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Howard v. FarrarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Wiebener v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Terry v. CreedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Ingram v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API