Puls v. Casey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County, before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burford, C. J.:
This was an action to recover damages for breach of contract. The plaintiff in error was the owner of a saloon, consisting of a stock of liquors and saloon fixtures at Dover, in Kingfisher county. The following written agreement was entered into by the parties to the action:
“Dover, Okla., 4-25-1903.
“It is agreed between L. Puls and Bobert Casey that L. Puls sells to said Casey his saloon fixtures and stock for the sum of $337.50 and invoice; said Casey pays to said Puls the said $337.50 cash to bind bargain, and L. Puls agrees to assist in every way…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Meierholtz v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
3Cited by22 opinions
- Howard v. FarrarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wiebener v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Terry v. CreedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Ingram v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.