Legal Opinion
Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Gilmore
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1948No. 3569PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Since prior to November 11, 1942, L. A. Gilmore, S. H. Gardner, and L. P. Kirk have been partners, doing business as Gilmore, Gardner & Kirk Oil Company. Fruehauf Trailer Company 2 is a Michigan corporation authorized to do business in Oklahoma. The Central Surety & Insuranee Corporation 3 is a Missouri corporation authorized to do business in Oklahoma.
By this action the partners and the Insurance Company sought recovery of amounts paid out by them by way of indemnity or restitution, predicated on alternative grounds, namely, negligence in failure to inspect a tank…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Appalachian Corp. v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Franklin v. Skelly Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Wadhams v. Flagler GayIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Janesville Cotton MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Welsh v. Gerber Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Taylor v. HawkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Trapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.