Hepner v. Quapaw Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion 'by
LOGSDON, 0.
There are four assignments of error in the petition in error, but plaintiff presents and argues in her brief only the fourth assignment, which is “that the court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant;” and since this involves a consideration of the entire record of the trial, me other assignments of error will be considered as waived.
Plaintiff’s testimony . conformed to the allegations of her petition, and the question for determination is whether, admitting the truth of all the evidence in favor of plaintiff, together with all inference- and conclusions…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Northup v. EakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Southern Indiana Gas Co. v. TynerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Ladow v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. RupeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Prest-O-Lite Co., Inc. v. HowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Tulsa, Okl. v. Von BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Highway Construction Co. v. ShueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.