Legal Opinion

Hinesley v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1947No. 31624PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Although the petition recites that it is brought in two counts, the defendant contends that a separate and distinct cause of action is not set out in each count, without reference to other portions of the pleadings, and that the petition only contains one count and is duplicitous in that it seeks to recover upon allegations of negligence and of wilful and wanton conduct, in the same count. These contentions of the defendant can not be legally sustained. The petition in this case was brought in substantially the same form as that in American Oil Co. v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Portner Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Abrams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Daniel v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rouse v. FussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Carroll v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. American Fire & Casualty Company v. GrizzleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Rogers v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Neiswonger v. JanicsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API