Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Citizens & Southern National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1936No. 11353PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Graham, Judge.

It is practically conceded that if Daniel is a de jure officer — that is, if the Governor had authority to suspend Hamilton as Treasurer and appoint Daniel in his stead pending the suspension, the bank would be fully protected in the payment of the funds on deposit to Daniel as State Treasurer. But it is insisted that Daniel is not a de jure officer; that the Governor had no authority to suspend Hamilton and appoint Daniel, it being contended that section 40-1301 of the Code should be construed as a limitation on the power of the Governor to suspend as stated in section 40-206;…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Gray v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Coleman v. GlennSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Goldberg v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Patten v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Atlanta Coach Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API