Rouse v. Fussell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Presiding Judge.
Special ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial assigns error on the admission of certain evidence, a hypothetical question, over objection. The ruling of the court was as follows: “I think it is admissible. If the facts as he stated them don’t appear in the record, I, of course, will rule the evidence out; now though subject to that, I am going to allow it.” No subsequent motion to rule out the evidence appears. “Where the court conditionally admits evidence, reserving a final ruling upon its competency until a later stage of the trial, it is not to be. expected…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Whatley v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Carmichael Tile Co. v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Healan v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Carroll v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Clarke County School District v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Cotten v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Frazier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Birge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Dennis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Hogan v. OliveraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.