Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Fussell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 21, 1962No. 39547PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

Special ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial assigns error on the admission of certain evidence, a hypothetical question, over objection. The ruling of the court was as follows: “I think it is admissible. If the facts as he stated them don’t appear in the record, I, of course, will rule the evidence out; now though subject to that, I am going to allow it.” No subsequent motion to rule out the evidence appears. “Where the court conditionally admits evidence, reserving a final ruling upon its competency until a later stage of the trial, it is not to be. expected…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whatley v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Carmichael Tile Co. v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Healan v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Carroll v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Clarke County School District v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Cotten v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Frazier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Birge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Dennis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Hogan v. OliveraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API