Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 23, 1958No. 37353PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

1. The evidence on the second trial was substantially the same as that adduced on the first trial, the testimony of the deceased plaintiff having been read to the jury from the transcript of the first trial, and while a verdict for the defendant was not demanded, it was authorized. Accordingly, the usual general grounds of the amended motion for new trial are, without merit.

2. Special ground numbered 6 of the amended motion for new trial appears, from a note attached by the trial court, to be an exception to an excerpt from the charge given at the request of the movant.

Where…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whatley v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Lovejoy v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Rentz v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Clary v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rouse v. FussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Merrill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Massee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Whidby v. Columbine Carrier, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. East Side Auto Parts, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API