Barsegian v. Kessler & Kessler
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, J.
Gohar Barsegian filed suit against attorney Warren J. Kessler and the law firm of Kessler & Kessler (collectively the Kessler defendants), Danny Pakravan, and 218 LLC, a limited liability company of which Pakravan was the sole member. The Kessler defendants moved to compel arbitration, but the remaining defendants did not. The trial court denied the motion to compel on grounds of waiver and the possibility of inconsistent rulings resulting from litigation with third parties, namely, Pakravan, 218 LLC, and Bahrain Newman. The Kessler defendants appeal. We affirm on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- 24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Dryer v. Los Angeles RamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Myers v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Garcia v. Pexco, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Abdul Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Abdul Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.