Legal Opinion

Abdul Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 21, 2016No. 15-16178Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED, No. 15-16178 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:14-cv-05200-EMC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, and HIREASE, LLC, Defendant. RONALD GILLETTE, No. 15-16181 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:14-cv-05241-EMC UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant. 2 MOHAMED V. UBER TECHNOLOGIES ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED, No. 15-16250 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API