Legal Opinion
Abdul Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 2016No. 15-16178, 15-16181, 15-16250PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellees Abdul Mohamed and Ronald Gillette, former Uber drivers, filed an action in district court alleging on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of other drivers that Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Hirease, LLC, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and various state statutes. Gillette has also brought a representative claim against Uber under California’s Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) alleging that he was misclassified as an independent contractor rather than an employee. The district court denied…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Mohammed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Congdon v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Lee v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Micheletti v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.