Sambursky v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Paul Sambursky appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief. We conclude the district court did not err in determining Sambur-sky’s guilty plea was made knowingly and voluntarily, but conclude Sambursky raised genuine issues of material fact on his claim for ineffective assistance of counsel. Sambursky is entitled to an evidentia-ry hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Therefore, the order denying the application for post-conviction relief is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
I
[¶ 2] In 2001 and 2002, a series of sexual…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Bahtiraj v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Lindsey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.