Legal Opinion
California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Matcovich
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1946No. Civ. No. 7216PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
—This is an action by the plaintiff commission to recover from defendant contributions alleged to be due plaintiff under the provisions of the California "Unemployment Insurance Act. (Stats. 1935, p. 1226, Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 8780d). The findings and judgment of the trial court were in favor of plaintiff, and defendant has appealed.
A summary of the evidence in support of the judgment discloses the following facts:
Appellant was engaged in the business of operating a so-called “taxi dance hall,” known as the “Rio Bar and Cafe,” in the city of Sacramento, where soft drinks and beer were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- California Employment Commission v. Los Angeles Down Town Shopping News Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Frommhagen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Hasselbach v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. CarmonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Cox v. State Social Welfare BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.