Cox v. State Social Welfare Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
Does a State Social Welfare Board regulation that requires the applicant for state old age security benefits to exhaust potential resources in the form of his wife’s present right to apply for federal benefits at the age of 62, instead of waiting until she reaches the age of 65, exceed legislative authorization, violate the Fourteenth Amendment and contravene an alleged previous contrary judgment of the superior court? The trial court answered these questions in the affirmative. We shall set forth the reasons which, we believe, compel the opposite result.
The proposed decision of the State…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- American Land Co. v. ZeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hurd v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983