Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Central Foundry Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1928No. 7 Div. 781PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The finding of facts and conclusions prescribed by section 7578 of thé Code in cases under the Workmen’s Compensation Act has an analogy in the special finding of fact under section 9500, in actions at law. The statute contemplates, not a recital of the evidence, with its conflicting lights and tendencies, but a determination by the trial judge of the facts established by the evidence, responsive to the issues presented, with the conclusion as to whether the facts found establish or fail to establish the liability asserted; and there should be a finding of every fact necessary to sustain the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hardisty v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Paramount Coal Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Brock v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. KeefeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. McCarley v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Head v. Triangle Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Hamilton Motor Co. v. CoonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Calvert v. FunderburgSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Richardson Lumber Co. v. PoundersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API