Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Woodward Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 17, 1924No. 6 Div. 9PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The petition is for writ of certiorari.
The submission was on motion and on merits.
The motion was to strike the bill of exceptions from the transcript.
The several recent decisions defining the office of a bill of exceptions in aid of such petition are Woodward Iron Co. v. Brad ford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 South. 803; Ex parte W. T. Smith Lbr. Co., 206 Ala. 485, 90 South. 807; Ex parte Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. (Greek’s Case) 207 Ala. 219, 92 South. 458; Ex parte L. & N. R. Co., 208 Ala. 216, 94 South. 289; Ex parte Nunnally Co. (Crosby’s Case) 209 Ala. 82, 95 South. 343; Ex parte Mt. Carmel Coal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ex Parte W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Martin v. Republic Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Agricola Furnace Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Ex Parte HenniesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Crowder v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Hardisty v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.