Legal Opinion

Victoria Groves Five v. Chaffey Joint Union High School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1990No. E007134PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DABNEY, Acting P. J.

Defendant, Chaffey Joint Union High School District (District), appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff, Victoria Groves Five, a California partnership, (Victoria), a refund of school facility fees. We reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

In September 1986 the Legislature enacted Government Code 1 sections 53080 2 and 65995 3 which authorized school districts to levy school facility fees on development. Under these statutes, the District adopted a resolution to levy a fee of $.47 per square foot on covered or enclosed space in new residential development. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Viking Pools, Inc. v. MaloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Warmington Old Town Associates, L.P. v. Tustin Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Patrice L. Goldman, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. 216 Sutter Bay Associates v. County of SutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Braman v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API