People v. Brewer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. Introduction
After he was convicted of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487), 1 the trial court ordered Robert Brewer to provide blood and saliva samples as a condition of probation. In so doing it relied, as authority for this condition, on section 296.1, subdivisions (c) and (d), of the DNA and Forensic Identification Data Base and Data Bank Act of 1998 (the DNA Act) (§ 295 et seq.). The trial court imposed this requirement on the basis of Brewer’s prior conviction for sexual battery, not his current conviction for grand theft. Brewer argues that the trial court’s reasoning was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. BiancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. C.B. (In Re C.B.)California Supreme Court · 2018
- Good v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. MoretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.