Legal Opinion

Warmington Old Town Associates, L.P. v. Tustin Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 2002No. G027494PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

In this case of first impression, we decide whether redevelopment construction is exempt from the imposition of school-impact fees under Education Code section 17620, subdivision (a)(1)(C)(i). The statutory provision does not expressly address redevelopment construction. However, the legislative history and the statutory exemptions given other types of construction under Education Code sections 17620, subdivision (a)(1)(A), and 17626 convince us the Legislature did not mean to provide an exemption for redevelopment construction.

Nonetheless, Government Code section 66001,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ehrlich v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Grupe Development Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Garrick Development Co. v. Hayward Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. American Coatings Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. California Building Industry Ass'n v. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. HOME BUILDERS ASSN. OF TULARE/KINGS COUNTIES, INC. v. City of LemooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Kinney v. OvertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API