Adams v. Harrington Hotel Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair; Tappan, J. Assumpsit by John Q. Adams against the Harrington Hotel Company on a contract for certain advertising. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This case was tried before the circuit judge without a jury. At the request of the plaintiff the judge made findings of fact and law. The court rendered judgment for defendant. Exceptions were taken to his findings. The case is brought here by writ of error. The facts are not in dispute. The defendant delivered to the plaintiff a paper reading as follows :
“Port Huron, 6-16, 1903.
“ In consideration of the Adams Advertising Agency of Omaha, Neb., supplying us with one of their ink well and stationery counter cabinets, like photo, of Los Angeles Mexican onyx & silver, holding elc. light, free of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilkinson v. HeavenrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Cooper v. Lansing Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Mull v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
- Miller v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. MathisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Brewer v. De Camp Glass Casket Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Hooge v. City of MilnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Willebrandt v. Sisters of MercyMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- South Branch Cheese Co. v. American Butter & Cheese Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916