Legal Opinion
Willebrandt v. Sisters of Mercy
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1915No. Docket No. 9PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by Emil Willebrandt and another against the Sisters of Mercy, a corporation, for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for defendant upon directed verdict. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Plaintiffs are manufacturers of sanitary furniture in St. Louis, Mo. Emil Willebrandt was their traveling man in Michigan, and had talked with a Sister in Grand Rapids in regard to the equipment of the new St. Mary’s Hospital. January 25, 1911, he obtained the following paper:
“Art Aseptible Furniture Company.
“St. Louis, Mo., Date 1-25-11.
“Sold to St. Mary’s Hospital.
“Address: Grand Rapids, Mich.
“Ship by C. & A. R. R.
“Terms: $100 per month.
1 No. 1111 sterilizer, 16 in. x 24 in. size...... $320 00
1 No. 1159 water sterilizer, 2 tanks, 16 in. x 36 in., with filters......................... 400 00
1…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Dorsey v. PackwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Wilkinson v. HeavenrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Krohn v. BantzIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Stiles v. McClellanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matchless Electric Co. v. Morley Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Goodspeed v. MacNaughton, Greenawalt & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Watson v. Andrews & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Joy v. PagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1939