Cooper v. Lansing Wheel Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts; are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Tbis is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to plaintiffs’ declaration.
Tbe first count of the declaration alleges an agreement “whereby the said defendant did undertake, promise, and agree, to and with the plaintiffs, to furnish, sell, and deliver to said plaintiffs all such number or quantity of wheels, * * * at and for an' agreed price, * * * as said plaintiffs should or might require or want, during the season of the year 1890, in their said business of manufacturing;” that during the season of 1890 plaintiffs agreed to order, and did order, of defendant, all of such wheels as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bailey v. AustrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
- Badger v. RanlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Tarbox v. GotzianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
- Keller v. YbarruCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by29 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Continental Can Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Hoffman v. MaffioliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Tennant v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Hickey v. O'BrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- El Rio Oils Ltd. v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.