State v. Lassiter
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Judge.
The defendants-appellants argue that the trial court committed error in failing to quash the amended warrants against the defendants upon their motions.
We hold that the amended warrants were sufficient to survive motions to quash. The warrants clearly charged a criminal offense created by and defined by G.S. 113-104.
G.S. 113-104 provides in pertinent part that “. . . [g]ame birds and game animals shall be taken only in the daytime, between sunrise and sunset, . . .” and that “. . . [n]o person shall take any game animals ... by aid of or with the use of any jacklight, or other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Milk Commission v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. PersonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BarberNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. HairstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Wilson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. McAuliffeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.