State v. Hales
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The warrant charges a violation of G.S. 14-72.1. The defendant may challenge the constitutionality of this statute by a demurrer, or by a motion to quash the warrant. S. v. Glidden Company, 228 N.C. 664, 46 S.E. 2d 860; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, pp. 343-4.
G.S. 14-72.1 reads: “Whoever, without authority, willfully conceals the goods or merchandise of any store, not theretofore purchased by such person, while still upon the premises of such store, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars ($100.00), or by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. . PartlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- State v. Barrett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. LowrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.