Legal Opinion

State v. Hales

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1961No. 217PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The warrant charges a violation of G.S. 14-72.1. The defendant may challenge the constitutionality of this statute by a demurrer, or by a motion to quash the warrant. S. v. Glidden Company, 228 N.C. 664, 46 S.E. 2d 860; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, pp. 343-4.

G.S. 14-72.1 reads: “Whoever, without authority, willfully conceals the goods or merchandise of any store, not theretofore purchased by such person, while still upon the premises of such store, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars ($100.00), or by…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. . PartlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. State v. Barrett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. LowrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API