Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 10, 1971No. 58PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant first contends that the court erred in permitting the witness White to testify as to the authorship of a letter allegedly written by defendant’s witness James McDougal. McDougal testified that he saw the defendant on the morning of the robbery, that the defendant was not himself, and that he appeared to be sick and in pain. On cross-examination McDougal testified that he wanted to help defendant but that he would not do anything dishonest to do so. He denied writing a letter purporting to be from him to the prosecutrix, Loretta Williams, offering her $200 not to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API