Legal Opinion

State v. Hairston

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 2000No. COA99-326PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

William Roosevelt Hairston (“defendant”) appeals his conviction of being an habitual felon, on the grounds that the trial court erred by denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the habitual felon indictment for insufficiency of the evidence. Defendant’s motion was made on the grounds that the statutory creation of a prima facie case in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-7.4 unconstitutionally shifts the burden of proof to the defendant in violation of due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. These amendments guarantee that an individual person may…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API