Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 10, 1936No. H-78PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORCROSS, District Judge.

A number of questions are involved'in this case, mainly growing out of the validity of certain subordination agreements entered into by the various state banks, of which plaintiff Schmitt is receiver. At the time of the trial it appeared that the subordination agreements as alleged in the complaint, in so far as they applied to the Bank of Nevada Savings & Trust Company and the Virginia City Bank, were not produced. The question was then for the first time raised as to whether such subordination agreements were ever executed and delivered to the defendant corporation.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Wardell v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Thomas v. Brownville, Fort Kearney, & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corpo. v. SchmittDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API