Legal Opinion

Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. Johnson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 8, 1919No. 23PublishedCited by 170 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney

This was an action brought under § 5239, Rev. Stats., in the then Circuit now District Court of the United States for the Northern District, of Texas by plaintiff in error, a national banking association which we may call for convenience the Bank, against defendant in error, formerly a member of its board of directors and its vice president, to hold him liable personally for damages sustained by the Bank in consequence of his having knowingly violated, as was alleged, the provisions of § 5200, Rev. Stats., as amended. June 22, 1906, c. 3516, 34 Stat. 451, by participating as such director and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. C & H NATIONWIDE, INC. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. SlatterySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API