Legal Opinion

Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 24, 1921No. 25PublishedCited by 277 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke

With formalities, which are not assailed, a special meeting of the stockholders of the Alice Gold & Silver Mining Company,' by resolution, ratified a contract. in writing, theretofore authorized by the board of directors and executed by the officers of the company, for the sale to the Anaconda Copper Mining Company of all the property, of every kind, of the Alice Company.- The officers were authorized and directed to execute such deeds and assignments as should be necessary to complete the sale; and a deed in form conveying all of the Alice property to the Anaconda Company was executed and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Wardell v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by277 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Wooley v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  4. United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Alexander v. HillmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

272 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API