Legal Opinion

Reconstruction Finance Corpo. v. Schmitt

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 1, 1937No. H—117PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORCROSS, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity to enjoin the sale of certain corporate stock in certain corporations and to obtain a declaration of the relative rights of plaintiff and defendant therein. The corporations were organized under the laws of the state of Nevada and are named as follows: Union Canal Ditch Company, Old Channel Ditch Company, Young Ditch Company, and Humboldt Lovelock Irrigation Light & Power Company.

The testimony and evidence submitted establishes the following facts:

On and prior to June 9, 1930, John G. Taylor was the owner of certain irrigated lands in Lovelock…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prosole v. Steamboat Canal Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ickes v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  3. Schmitt v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1936
  4. United States v. Humboldt Lovelock Irr. Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific States Savings & Loan Corp. v. SchmittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API