Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Detrick

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1950No. Civ. 17346PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Two appeals are involved. Two separate canses were consolidated for trial, namely, an action for divorce, and a suit to quiet titie to the property involved in the complaint for divorce. Two separate judgments were entered based upon two separate decisions. Despite the title of the case, the parties are husband and wife. To avoid confusion they will be referred to as “husband” and “wife.” The latter’s sister, Marie Alden Hopkins, is an incidental party, husband having sued her to quiet title to a certain real property. Her fortunes go with those of Helen Louise.

Husband and wife were married…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Tassi v. TassiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Barker v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Friedlander v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Riesenberg v. RiesenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API