Legal Opinion

Riesenberg v. Riesenberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1950No. Civ. 17293PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValles, J.

Appeal by defendant from an interlocutory judgment of divorce granted plaintiff.

At the time the parties married, plaintiff husband owned real and personal property of the value of about $26,400; defendant wife owned personal property consisting of stocks and bonds of the value of about $5,000. Shortly thereafter plaintiff transferred most of his separate property to defendant and himself as joint tenants, and defendant transferred her separate property to plaintiff and herself as joint tenants. During their married life the parties deposited income from the properties in joint tenancy bank…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Trancoso v. TrancosoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maslow v. MaslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Murphy v. AblowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Ford v. Palisades Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Guardianship of WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Handley v. HandleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API