Hilliard v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARRIS, Justice.
Danny Hilliard appeals a conviction for retaliation under Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 36.06 (Vernon 1989). He was sentenced by a jury to eight years’ confinement. On appeal, he claims the trial court erred in the following: (1) permitting the introduction of extraneous offense evidence not relevant to any issue at trial; (2) permitting the introduction of photographs when their prejudicial potential outweighed any probative value; (3) permitting the State to ask an irrelevant and inflammatory question of appellant during cross-examination concerning a prior extraneous…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Maynard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Alvarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Guzmon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Russell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Booker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Fletcher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
- In Re SpeerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.