Legal Opinion

Hilliard v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 24, 1994No. 2-93-223-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

Danny Hilliard appeals a conviction for retaliation under Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 36.06 (Vernon 1989). He was sentenced by a jury to eight years’ confinement. On appeal, he claims the trial court erred in the following: (1) permitting the introduction of extraneous offense evidence not relevant to any issue at trial; (2) permitting the introduction of photographs when their prejudicial potential outweighed any probative value; (3) permitting the State to ask an irrelevant and inflammatory question of appellant during cross-examination concerning a prior extraneous…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Maynard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Alvarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Guzmon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Russell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Booker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Fletcher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
  5. In Re SpeerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API