In Re Speer
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARDS, Justice.
I.INTRODUCTION
In this discovery dispute, Buzz Speer seeks mandamus review of a trial court order finding that Speer waived his privilege against self-incrimination by answering five interrogatories. The trial court ordered Speer to answer all remaining interrogatories and to produce requested documents in camera. Because we find that Speer did not waive his privilege against self-incrimination, we conditionally grant mandamus relief as to the interrogatories. However, we deny mandamus relief as to the document production.
II.FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The real party in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re the Commitment of Browning, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- In Re Verbois, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- In Re the Commitment of Lowe, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
- In Re Edge Capital Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.