Legal Opinion

Leday v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1998No. 1125-97PublishedCited by 1,090 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · WomackWomack, J.

in which OVERSTREET, MEYERS, MANSFIELD, PRICE, and HOLLAND, JJ., joined.

This case calls for us to reconsider the effect of a defendant’s admissions of guilt at the guilt stage and at the punishment stage of a bifurcated trial — the so-called “curative admissibility” and “DeGarmo ” doctrines.

I

The appellant was indicted for possession of 28 grams or more of cocaine, a felony which at the time of the offense (November 24, 1993) was punishable by confinement for life or a term of 5 to 99 years and a fine not to exceed $50,000.1 His motion to suppress the cocaine and testimony about it, on…

3Cases cited94 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1,090 opinions

  1. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Jaynes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

1,085 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API