Leday v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · WomackWomack, J.
in which OVERSTREET, MEYERS, MANSFIELD, PRICE, and HOLLAND, JJ., joined.
This case calls for us to reconsider the effect of a defendant’s admissions of guilt at the guilt stage and at the punishment stage of a bifurcated trial — the so-called “curative admissibility” and “DeGarmo ” doctrines.
I
The appellant was indicted for possession of 28 grams or more of cocaine, a felony which at the time of the offense (November 24, 1993) was punishable by confinement for life or a term of 5 to 99 years and a fine not to exceed $50,000.1 His motion to suppress the cocaine and testimony about it, on…
3Cases cited94 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1,090 opinions
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jaynes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
1,085 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.