Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 17, 2003No. 2-01-055-CRPublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE WALKER, Justice.

I. Introduction

A jury convicted Appellant Carlis Jovon-ite Russell of capital murder and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment. The primary issue we address in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting testimony and detailed evidence regarding an extraneous offense, the Vogt Street offense, during the State’s case-in-chief. The Vogt Street offense was arguably relevant to prove intent, but its prejudicial effect greatly outweighed its probative value. Accordingly, the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the Vogt…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Johnston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Newton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  4. Edward George McGregor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  5. Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API