Harris v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
Before us for automatic review1 are a conviction for the offense of capital murder 2 and sentence of death assessed pursuant to Article 37.071(e), V.A.C.C.P.
Appellant contends the trial court’s refusal to allow effective crossexamination of the State’s witness, Valerie Rencher, in order to establish her bias or motive in testifying, denied him his constitutional right to confrontation. See U.S. Const. Amend. VI; and Tex. Const., Article I, § 10. Facts germane to the disposition of this ground of error will be set out below.
The only evidence adduced at trial which…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Virts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Carpenter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.