Pearson v. McKinney
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County and from an order denying a new trial. F. E. Densmore, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Appeals by defendant from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.
The plaintiff sued to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the refusal of the decedent, E. E. Hendrick, to deliver to plaintiff certain orange and lemon trees bought by plaintiff of decedent. The action was begun in Hendrick’s lifetime. He died before the trial and the present defendant,' as administrator, etc., was substituted as the party defendant in his stead. Judgment was given in favor of plaintiff for $28,453.40.
The agreement of sale was in writing and is made a part of the complaint.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dexter v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Stewart v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Pierce v. LukensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Cole v. SwanstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
- B. N. Scribner & Co. v. SchenkelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Dunbar Molasses Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Brittalia Ventures v. STUKE NURSERY CO.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Pearson v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Sunseri v. Garcia & Maggini Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Pearson v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.