Pearson v. Parsons
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The complaint alleges that on or about November 12, 1906, the plaintiff and E. E. Hendrick entered into an agreement whereby said Hendrick agreed to sell plaintiff twenty-five thousand orange trees at a price therein stated; that by the terms of said agreement plaintiff was given an option to purchase twenty-five thousand additional trees upon the same terms and conditions as provided in said agreement for the purchase of the first twenty-five thousand trees; that on or about February 20, 1907, plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Pearson v. McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ruble v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Moul v. McVeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Filmer v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928