Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Parsons

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1916No. L. A. No. 3763PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

The complaint alleges that on or about November 12, 1906, the plaintiff and E. E. Hendrick entered into an agreement whereby said Hendrick agreed to sell plaintiff twenty-five thousand orange trees at a price therein stated; that by the terms of said agreement plaintiff was given an option to purchase twenty-five thousand additional trees upon the same terms and conditions as provided in said agreement for the purchase of the first twenty-five thousand trees; that on or about February 20, 1907, plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Pearson v. McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Ruble v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Moul v. McVeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Filmer v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API