Legal Opinion
Brittalia Ventures v. STUKE NURSERY CO.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 2007No. C047837, C048252, C049334PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
These consolidated appeals involve a breach of contract. Defendant Stake Nursery Co., Inc. (Stake), appeals from the judgment and denial of its postjudgment challenges, and from the postjudgment award of attorney fees, all in favor of plaintiff Brittalia Ventures (Brittalia). Brittalia cross-appeals from the amount of attorney fees awarded.
The key issue concerned what comprised the contract between Stake and Brittalia. We shall affirm the judgment but reverse the award of attorney fees because the contract between the parties did not contain an attorney fee provision.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Charlie Y., Inc. v. Carey (In Re Carey)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Linear Technology Corp. v. Tokyo Electron Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- AMS Plastics v. Speculative Product Design CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.