B. N. Scribner & Co. v. Schenkel
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The appeal is from the judgment. The contention of appellant is that under the findings the judgment should have been for fourteen hundred and thirty-five dollars and thirty-four cents, in addition to the sum of two hundred and seventeen dollars and fifteen cents, the amount for which judgment was given.
The facts admitted or found hy the court are the following: One J. R. Crockett was in Glenn county, buying sheep and hogs. He entered into negotiations with plaintiff for the pur-, chase of some of the latter. ' On the eleventh day of October a letter was received hy the plaintiffs from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Douglass v. HowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Lessee of Adams v. JeffriesOhio Supreme Court · 1843
- Reif v. PaigeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Bates v. StarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Harson v. PikeIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gianelli v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Pearson v. McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Merz v. PooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Stewart v. Knight & Jillson Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Barnes v. OsgoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.