J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Copren Bros.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County. Stanley A. Smith, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The action was by plaintiff to recover an alleged balance due upon three certain promissory notes, executed by defendants to plaintiff as part payment of the purchase price of a certain thirty horse-power traction engine sold by plaintiff to defendants, and to have foreclosed a certain chattel mortgage on said engine given to secure the payment of said promissory notes. Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants prosecute this appeal.
This ease has been before us twice before. The first appeal was from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, which judgment, on November 25, 1916, was reversed.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Cowell v. Springs Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Close v. Glenwood CemeterySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Emigrant Co. v. County of AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Commercial Centre Realty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.