Legal Opinion

Webber v. California & Oregon Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876No. 4626PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Tenth Judicial District, County of Yuba. The plaintiff owned a lot of land in the city of Marysville, upon which he had erected a wagon-shop, in which he was carrying on business. The title deeds under which he held the lot, described it as bounded by, upon or along Fourth street on the north, and A street on the east.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court, Tenth Judicial District, County of Yuba. The plaintiff owned a lot of land in the city of Marysville, upon which he had erected a wagon-shop, in which he was carrying on business. The title deeds under which he held the lot, described it as bounded by, upon or along Fourth street on the north, and A street on the east. The defendant appropriated the greater part of the bed of the streets in front of the lot, by constructing thereon a high embankment, upon which it laid a railroad.- This action was brought to recover damages. The plaintiff had judgment, and the…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The deeds from Buchanan to Said & Bodley, conveyed the lands to the center of the street. (Moody v. Palmer, 50 Cal. 31.)

All other questions have been expressly waived by counsel.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moody v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weyl v. Sonoma Valley R.R.California Supreme Court · 1886
  2. City of Redlands v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Speer v. BlaskerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API